Cases 1 - 10 of 34
Robinson v. Cyber Space LTD Industry et al
as 2:2024cv00322
Plaintiff:
Vickie Lynn Robinson
Defendant:
Cyber Space LTD Industry, Virginia Internet Providers, Dollar General and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00325
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Michael Fernandez, D.D.S., Ltd. et al v. Commissioner of Highways et al
as 2:2023cv00069
Plaintiff:
Dr. Michael Fernandez, D.D.S., Ltd. and Dr. Miguel Fernandez, D.D.S.
Defendant:
Commissioner of Highways, Virginia Department of Transportation, Stephen C Birch, P.E., Commissioner of Highways individually and in his official capacity and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2021cv00011
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Thatch v. Pariser Dermatology Specialists, Ltd. et al
as 2:2020cv00528
Plaintiff:
Latoya Thatch
Defendant:
Pariser Dermatology Specialists, Ltd. and Cyndi Torosky
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv00883
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Range v. Van Metre et al
as 1:2020cv00123
Defendant:
Amazon.com, Stacey, Magistrate Judge Michael Nachmanoff and others
Plaintiff:
Davetta Lynn Range
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv00566
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv00018
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2017cv00138
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
