Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Stanley Caterbone v. Lancaster City Police Departme, et al
as 22-1197
Plaintiff / Appellant:
STANLEY J. CATERBONE
Defendant / Appellee:
LANCASTER CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT and BARRY HANDWERGER, Solicitor for Lancaster City Police, Mayors Office
Defendant:
LANCASTER COUNTY COURT OF COMMON PLEAS, JUDGE DONALD TOTARO, Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas, MARK WILSON, Director of Lancaster County Adult Probation and others
CATERBONE v. Lancaster City Police Department et al
as 5:2021cv05683
Plaintiff:
STANLEY J. CATERBONE
Defendant:
Lancaster City Police Department, Barry Handwerger, Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CATERBONE v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 5:2018cv02712
Plaintiff:
STAN J. CATERBONE
Defendant:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, LANCASTER COUNTY COURT OF COMMON PLEAS and PENNSYLVANIA COMMONWEALTH COURT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Patterson v. Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas et al
as 0:2010cv01099
Plaintiff:
Patricia Patterson
Defendant:
Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas and South Carolina Workers Compensation Commission
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Patterson v. Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas et al
as 0:2010cv03099
Plaintiff:
Patricia Patterson
Defendant:
Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas and South Carolina Workers Compensation Commission
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Patterson v. South Carolina Worker's Compensation Commission, The et al
as 3:2010cv02968
Plaintiff:
Patricia T Patterson
Defendant:
South Carolina Worker's Compensation Commission, The, Lisha Booth, Dana Stogner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stanley Caterbone, et al v. Fulton Financial Corp, et al
as 10-2313
Plaintiff - Appellant:
STANLEY J. CATERBONE and ADVANCED MEDIA GRP
Defendant - Appellee:
FULTON FIN CORP, R. SCOTT SMITH, CHAIRMAN AND CEO, PHILLIP WENGER, CHIEF OPERATING OFFICER OF FULTON FINANCIAL CORPORATION and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
