Cases 1 - 10 of 69
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-10682
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Lattimore v. Floor and Decor of America
as 8:2024cv00255
Plaintiff:
Darrel Lattimore
Defendant:
Floor and Decor of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Civil Rights Act
Mawule Tepe v. USA, et al
as 23-6086
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MAWULE TEPE
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, CURTIS L. COLLIER, United States District Court Judge, KATHERINE A. CRYTZER, United States District Court Judge and others
Mawule Tepe v. Lucille Nelson, et al
as 23-6095
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MAWULE TEPE
Defendant / Appellee:
LUCILLE LATTIMORE NELSON, OGLETREE, DEAKINS, NASH, SMOAK & STEWART, P.C. and WHIRLPOOL CORPORATION
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-6097
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv01048
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv04205
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (other)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00161
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Mawule Tepe v. USA, et al
as 23-5593
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MAWULE TEPE
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, CURTIS L. COLLIER, United States District Court Judge, KATHERINE A. CRYTZER, United States District Court Judge and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01907
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq. Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
