Cases 1 - 10 of 21
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv03211
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Holloway v. Phone Tech et al
as 8:2022cv00259
Plaintiff:
Walter Henderson Holloway
Defendant:
Phone Tech, Brands Recalled for Shocking People, Secretary of State and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Holloway v. Held Records of DMV et al
as 8:2021cv00207
Defendant:
The Driver Attorney/Lawyer Micheal Dowd of Corrigan Dowd Law Firm and Held Records of DMV
Plaintiff:
Walter H. Holloway
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Akeyo v. Frederich et al
as 8:2020cv00300
Defendant:
Brenda S. Spilker, Daniiel Frederich, Jessica Pote and others
Plaintiff:
Valerie T. Akeyo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2020cv00266
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gardner v. Coe et al
as 8:2019cv00521
Defendant:
Patrick E. McNamara, James R. Coe, Timothy E. Clarke and others
Plaintiff:
Bryant A. Gardner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Draper v. Round Hill Pacific Management LLC et al
as 8:2019cv00203
Defendant:
Charles Karl, Emily Hellbush, The City of Omaha Police Department and others
Plaintiff:
Shakeeta Draper
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gardner v. Rensch & Rensch Law et al
as 8:2018cv00071
Defendant:
James R. Coe and Rensch & Rensch Law
Plaintiff:
Bryant Gardner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1985 Conspiracy to interfere with civil rights
Carter v. Muldoon et al
as 8:2017cv00319
Plaintiff:
John M. Carter
Defendant:
Does 1-25 inclusive, William Muldoon, Nebraska Law Enforcement Training Center and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Brooks v. Thietje et al
as 4:2017cv03016
Plaintiff:
Clinton Brooks, Jr.
Defendant:
Law Office of Demars Gordon Olson, Zalewski, Wynner and Maria Thietje
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
