Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01184
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
WELTCH et al v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2020cv03432
Plaintiff:
MATT DELATOUR, KARLY SOLDNER, NINA FROGGATT and others
Defendant:
JOHN DOES 1-100 and CITY OF PHILADELPHIA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jacobs v. Parker et al
as 1:2019cv00195
Defendant:
Dartmouth Hitchcock Medical Center, Linda Mallon, Stephanie Parker and others
Plaintiff:
Lisa Jacobs
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Jacobs v. Mallon et al
as 1:2019cv00184
Defendant:
Dartmouth Hitchcock Medical Center, Linda Mallon, John Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Lisa Jacobs
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Jacobs v. Cotterell et al
as 1:2019cv00142
Defendant:
Mark Cotterell, Dartmouth Hitchcock Medical Center, John Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Lisa Jacobs
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Jacobs v. Mitchell et al
as 1:2019cv00090
Defendant:
Lynne Mitchell, Alex DeNesnera, Dartmouth Hitchcock Medical Center and others
Plaintiff:
Lisa Jacobs
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Jacobs v. Gnanasagarem et al
as 1:2019cv00089
Defendant:
Dartmouth Hitchcock Medical Center, Linda Mallon, John Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Lisa Jacobs
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Jacobs v. Davenport, et al
as 15-1735
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LISA JACOBS
Defendant - Appellee:
DEBORAH DAVENPORT, WESTON, MA, DONNA VANDERCLOCK and others
Defendant:
GIACALONE LEVIN
Interested Party:
MIDDLESEX DISTRICT ATTORNEY'S OFFICE
Jacobs v. Soars, et al
as 15-1734
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LISA JACOBS
Defendant - Appellee:
DAVID SOARS, DEBORAH DAVENPORT, WESTON, MA and others
Interested Party:
MIDDLESEX DISTRICT ATTORNEY'S OFFICE
Jacobs v. Mooney, et al
as 15-1644
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LISA JACOBS
Defendant - Appellee:
KEVIN MOONEY, STEVE SHAW, JOHN LYONS and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
