Cases 1 - 10 of 25
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2023cv00429
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 American Disabilities Act
Jeff Macy et al v. San Bernardino County Code Enforcement et al
as 5:2023cv01955
Plaintiff:
Jeff Macy and Lynn Macy
Defendant:
San Bernardino County Code Enforcement, Fire Abatement, CSA 18 Special Districts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01201
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Flores, Valerie v. Dane County et al
as 3:2023cv00185
Plaintiff:
Valerie L. Flores, Valerie L. Kreger and Valerie Kreger-Mueller
Defendant:
Dane County and David M. Flores
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv05772
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Flores v. The City of San Benito, Texas et al
as 1:2020cv00169
Defendant:
Cameron County Constable Pct. 5, Oscar Lara, David Rebollado and others
Plaintiff:
APRIL M FLORES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Luis Flores v. Russell Gay, Jr.
as 17-55244
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LUIS M. FLORES
Defendant - Appellee:
RUSSELL A. GAY, Jr.
Barrera et al v. Zapata Consolidated Independent School District et al
as 5:2016cv00298
Plaintiff:
Suzette M Barrera and Gerardo D Montes
Defendant:
Zapata Consolidated Independent School District, Jose M Flores, Manuel Gonzalez, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv00326
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 15-41099
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
