Cases 1 - 10 of 18
SANTIAGO v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2023cv03317
Plaintiff:
JUAN ROSARIO SANTIAGO
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, BLANCHE CARNEY, MICHELE FARRELL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Clervrain v. Healey et al
as 1:2022cv10545
Plaintiff:
Manetirony Clervrain
Defendant:
Attorney General Maura Healey, Bill Galvin, Ed Markey and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
ELLIS v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2018cv05046
Defendant:
SEARGENT A. LEBESCO, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER O. MURRAY, JOHN DOE #1 and others
Plaintiff:
SYLVESTER ELLIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CHARLESTON v. CORIZON HEALTH, INC. et al
as 2:2017cv03039
Defendant:
GERALD MAY, BRUCE BLATT, ELMEADA FRIAS and others
Plaintiff:
WAYNE CHARLESTON, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
I.Z. v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2017cv01517
Plaintiff:
I.Z.
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, BLANCHE CARNEY, MICHELE FARRELL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SUMMERS v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2017cv00191
Plaintiff:
WENDY SUMMERS
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, JOHN P. DELANEY, WILLIAM LAWTON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SHOATZ v. FARRELL et al
as 2:2016cv03021
Plaintiff:
MAURICE SHOATZ
Defendant:
MICHELLE FARRELL, JOHN/JANE DOES 1-10, CYNTHIA LINK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BROWN v. DOE et al
as 2:2016cv02495
Plaintiff:
KENNY BROWN
Defendant:
JOHN DOE, CITY OF PHILADELPHIA and MICHELE FARRELL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
LEWIS v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2016cv01481
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY LEWIS
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, MICHAEL R. RESNICK, MICHELE FARRELL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GRYCZEWSKI et al v. NUTTER et al
as 2:2016cv00152
Plaintiff:
PRZEMYSLAW GRYCZEWSKI
Defendant:
MICHAEL NUTTER, LOUIS GIORLA, MICHELLE FARRELL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
