Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Clark v. DeMato et al
as 2:2023cv02685
Plaintiff:
Kristopher Clark
Defendant:
Michael DeMato, Ricky Malbrough, Russell Walker, II and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Williams v. Beaumont ISD Police Department et al
as 1:2022cv00165
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Williams
Defendant:
Beaumont ISD Police Department, Beaumont ISD and Joseph Shawnta Malbrough
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Malbrough v Holmes et al
as 3:2017cv00283
Plaintiff:
Nicole Malbrough
Defendant:
Jason Deon Holmes, Texas Department Of Criminal Justice and University of Texas Medical Branch
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv02321
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv01166
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Woods et al v. Bocz et al
as 2:2011cv01146
Plaintiff:
Barbara Woods , Kevin Griddle , Lisa Kirklin Scott and others
Defendant:
Elwyn Bocz , Jason Amato , Wilson Malbrough, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Wright v. Malbrough et al
as 2:2010cv02935
Plaintiff:
Glenn Rodney Wright
Defendant:
Marlon Malbrough, Mphs Sheriff Dept, U.S. Techno Satellite and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Malbrough v. Rayne et al
as 6:2010cv00107
Plaintiff:
Henry Lee Malbrough
Defendant:
Police Dept of Rayne, Carroll J Stelly, Parish of Acadia and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2009cv02984
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv03443
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
