Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00638
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Interested Party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Not Classified By Court:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Chapman v. Honolulu Police Department et al
as 1:2020cv00255
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Marie Chapman
Defendant:
Pamela Nakanaula, Honolulu Police Department, Kyle Echiberi and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Morgan v. Chapman et al
as 6:2020cv00027
Defendant:
Belinda West and Mary Chapman
Plaintiff:
Courtney R. Morgan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Courtney Morgan v. Scott Freshour, et al
as 18-40491
Plaintiff - Appellee:
COURTNEY MORGAN
Defendant - Appellant:
MARY CHAPMAN and JOHN KOPACZ
Gene Barry v. Scott Freshour, et al
as 17-20726
Plaintiff - Appellee:
DOCTOR GENE N. BARRY
Defendant - Appellant:
SCOTT M. FRESHOUR, BELINDA WEST, MARI ROBINSON and others
Barry v. Freshour et al
as 4:2017cv01403
Plaintiff:
Gene N Barry
Defendant:
Scott M Freshour, Belinda West, Mari Robinson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Morgan et al v. Freshour et al
as 6:2017cv00004
Plaintiff:
Courtney Morgan , Drive Thru Doc, PLLC and Hop Medical Services, M.D.P.A.
Defendant:
Scott Freshour, Mary Chapman and John Kopacz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Joseph Cotropia v. Mary Chapman, et al
as 16-20766
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOSEPH COTROPIA
Defendant - Appellee:
MARY CHAPMAN, Only in her Individual Capacity, TEXAS MEDICAL BOARD, MEMBERS OF THE TEXAS MEDICAL BOARD and others
Cotropia v Mary Chapman, et al
as 4:2016cv00742
Plaintiff:
Joseph Cotropia
Defendant:
Mary Chapman, Texas Medical Board, Members of the Texas Medical Board and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Spaugh v. Chapman
as 4:2015cv00906
Plaintiff:
Betty Spaugh
Defendant:
Mary Chapman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
