Cases 1 - 10 of 24
Manning v. Richardson et al
as 3:2023cv00139
Plaintiff:
Michael Todd Manning
Defendant:
Cindy LuAnn Richardson, Sandra Lowburg, Susan Orr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Cross v. Cross et al
as 3:2023cv00126
Plaintiff:
Melissa Moody Cross
Defendant:
Katrina Richardson Cross, Does Human Society, Administrator of DHS and Randall Henley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Manning v. Richardson et al
as 3:2023cv00084
Plaintiff:
Michael Todd Manning
Defendant:
Cindy LuAnn Richardson, Sandra Lowburg, Susan Orr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Manning v. Richardson et al
as 3:2022cv00305
Plaintiff:
Michael Todd Manning
Defendant:
Cindy LuAnn Richardson, Sandra Lowburg, Susan Orr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Manning v. Richardson et al
as 3:2022cv00284
Plaintiff:
Michael Todd Manning
Defendant:
Cindy LuAnn Richardson, Sandra Lowburg, Susan Orr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Cross v. Cross et al
as 3:2021cv00264
Plaintiff:
Melissa Moody Cross
Defendant:
Katrina Cross, Elembaugh, Rodney Cross and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Librace v. Moody et al
as 4:2021cv01198
Plaintiff:
David Librace
Defendant:
James Moody and Billy Roy Wilson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Baxter v. Stephens et al
as 3:2021cv00241
Plaintiff:
Tye Baxter
Defendant:
Shawn Stephens, Aaron Moody and Independence County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moseby v. Arkansas, State of et al
as 4:2021cv00484
Defendant:
John Ogles, Department of Finance and Administration, Arkansas, State of and others
Plaintiff:
Cleveland Moseby
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McCoy v. Blevins et al
as 3:2020cv00345
Defendant:
James Moody, Miranda Blevins and Van Hutchinson
Plaintiff:
Mark W McCoy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
