Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Dineen Etienne v. Machelle Sanders
as 24-1044
Plaintiff:
DINEEN CHERYLANN ETIENNE
Defendant:
MACHELLE SANDERS, Secretary, North Carolina Department of Administration; North Carolina Department of Commerce, TAMMIE ELAINE HALL, Division Executive Director, Historically Underutilized Businesses, BENNY SLOAN, DBW Certification Officer, North Carolina Department of Transportation and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 15-1324
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv00045
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv00294
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2012cv00841
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Latu v. North Carolina Medicaid DMA et al
as 3:2011cv00427
Plaintiff:
Tupou Helu Latu
Defendant:
North Carolina Medicaid DMA , Graigan L. Gray , NC Department of Health and Human Services and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Jasion v. Lay et al
as 5:2010cv00142
Plaintiff:
Peter S. Jasion
Defendant:
Kenneth R. Lay, Reginald S. Hinton, E. Norris Tolson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pinella v. City of Fayetteville, N.C. et al
as 5:2010cv00083
Plaintiff:
Mark Pinella
Defendant:
City of Fayetteville, N.C., Christopher L. Cody, North Carolina Department of Revenue and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv00800
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Unlawful Employment Practices
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2009cv00420
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
