Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01657
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv02231
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv02982
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
SPARGER-WITHERS v. TAYLOR et al
as 1:2021cv02824
Plaintiff:
AMYA SPARGER-WITHERS
Defendant:
JOSHUA N. TAYLOR, BLACKFORD COUNTY PROSECUTING ATTORNEY, DEARBORN AND OHIO COUNTY PROSECUTING ATTORNEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WILSON v. VILLIAGE OF UNION CITY, OHIO et al
as 1:2021cv00361
Defendant:
VILLIAGE OF UNION CITY, OHIO, SHANE GRIEVES, MARK ATER and others
Plaintiff:
CALVIN WILSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00908
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cannon Bey et al v. The State of Illinois et al
as 2:2020cv00480
Defendant:
Robert Dyckman, Oak Park, IL Police Department, D Guzman and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher H Cannon Bey, Travis Austin Bey and Damien Holman Bey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv00330
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
BATES et al v. STATE OF OHIO et al
as 1:2017cv01586
Plaintiff:
CLAYTON M BATES, MISTY C. BRICKLES, FAMILY AND KIN OF CLAYTON M. BATES and others
Defendant:
ANNEKA COLLINS, RICHARD M. DEWINE, KEVIN GREER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
HURT v. FERGUSON, MISSOURI et al
as 1:2015cv01054
Defendant:
ALL LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICIALS WITHIN THIS NATION, BALTIMORE, MARYLAND, CHIEF OF POLICE and others
Plaintiff:
TYRONE HURT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
