Cases 1 - 10 of 29
Small et al v. Poplar Bluff Regional Medical Center et al
as 1:2023cv00123
Plaintiff:
Shawnetta Small and Hairtabulous, LLC
Defendant:
Poplar Bluff Regional Medical Center, Courtenay Lee Miller, Tyronn Wise and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Miller v. Wilcot et al
as 4:2023cv00864
Plaintiff:
Matthew W. Miller
Defendant:
Dan Wilcot, William K. Busch, Lynn A. Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv06048
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Perkins v. Frye
as 4:2023cv00420
Plaintiff:
Mr. Dennis E Perkins and Mr. Eugene Perkins
Defendant:
Off. Derrick Frye and Derrick Frye
Perkins et al v. Fenner et al
as 4:2023cv00021
Plaintiff:
Marcellus Jerome Perkins and Bleu Room Entertainment, LLC
Defendant:
Judge Gary A Fenner and United States District Court Western District of Missouri
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Perkins v. Jackson County, Missouri et al
as 4:2022cv00156
Plaintiff:
Marcellus J.W. Perkins
Defendant:
Jackson County, Missouri, Quinton Lucas, Emanuel Cleaver and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2021cv00820
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
McKinley v. Perkins et al
as 4:2021cv01015
Plaintiff:
Donavan McKinley
Defendant:
Aaron Perkins and City of St. Louis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Perkins v. Frye et al
as 4:2020cv01433
Defendant:
City of St. Louis, Detective Derrick Frye and Derrick Frye
Plaintiff:
Eugene Perkins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2019cv01892
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
