Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2022cv01277
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Ah Puck v. Federal Government of the United States et al
as 1:2020cv00565
Plaintiff:
King Hardy Keolama Ah Puck, Jr.
Defendant:
U.S. Department of Treasury, Federal Government of the United States and Internal Revenue Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Ah Puck, Jr. v. Lahaina District Court Judges et al
as 1:2020cv00566
Defendant:
United States of Federal Claims, Internal Revenue Service and Lahaina District Court Judges
Plaintiff:
Hardy K. Ah Puck, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ah Puck, Jr. v. Lahaina Police Department
as 1:2019cv00636
Defendant:
The United States Court of Federal Claims and Lahaina Police Department
Plaintiff:
Hardy K. Ah Puck, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2012cv03694
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Veith v. Portage County, Ohio, Board of Commissioners et al
as 5:2011cv02542
Plaintiff:
Debbie Veith
Defendant:
Portage County, Ohio, Board of Commissioners, David W. Doak, Steve Jaehn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv07951
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Dearborn Avenue Bistro, Incorporated et al v. Dearborn, City of
as 2:2007cv14423
Plaintiff:
Dearborn Avenue Bistro, Incorporated, Stephanie Wisenberg, Ross Enterprises, Incorporated and others
Defendant:
Dearborn, City of
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Bob Linden et al v. City of Beverly Hills et al
as 2:2007cv05799
Plaintiff:
Bob Linden, Bob Linden, Jerold Friedman and others
Defendant:
City of Beverly Hills, Beverly Hills Police Department, David L Snowden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
