Cases 1 - 10 of 39
Riley v. Clayton County, Georgia et al
as 1:2024cv01567
Plaintiff:
Cordero Riley
Defendant:
Clayton County, Georgia, Jeffrey Turner, Alieka Anderson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00065
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01109
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1681 Title IX Educational Amendments 1992 - Sex Discrimination
Riley v. Gwinett County Police Department
as 1:2022cv04497
Plaintiff:
Shevelle M. Riley, Jr.
Defendant:
Gwinett County Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Engleman v. Nix et al
as 1:2022cv00903
Plaintiff:
Lily Engleman
Defendant:
William Clayton Nix, John Richey, Tomekia Jordan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
PATTERSON v. SPROUL et al
as 1:2021cv00154
Plaintiff:
ROLONDA PATTERSON
Defendant:
KEVIN SPROUL, DOUGHERTY COUNTY, PHOEBE PHYSICIANS GROUP, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wilis v. Mitchell et al
as 3:2021cv00049
Plaintiff:
Prentice David Wilis
Defendant:
Clarence Mitchell, Riley Windham, William Pittman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv04529
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv04454
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Jones et al v. Brooks Crossing Atlanta Apartments LP et al
as 1:2020cv02960
Plaintiff:
Diana Wright, Rhodena S. Kennedy, Latonya Williams-Simmons and others
Defendant:
Brooks Crossing GP, Inc, Brooks Crossing Atlanta Apartments LP, Pam Bussey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 3601
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
