Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Anderson v. Memphis Union Mission et al
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 2:2022cv02402
Not Classified By Court:
Temiika Gipson
Plaintiff:
Dwayne Anderson
Defendant:
Memphis Union Mission, D. Scott Bjork, Terry W. Brimhall and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Christina Holton v. Tanja Battle, et al
as 17-10998
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHRISTINA HOLTON
Defendant - Appellee:
TANJA D. BATTLE, in her official capacity as Executive Director of the Georgia Board of Dentistry, RICHARD BENNETT, LOGAN BUZZY NALLEY, JR. and others
Collins v. Battle et al
as 1:2014cv03824
Plaintiff:
Christina Collins
Defendant:
Tanja D. Battle, Richard Bennett, Logan Buzzy Nalley, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Eck v. Battle et al
as 1:2014cv00962
Plaintiff:
Trisha Eck
Defendant:
Tanja D. Battle , Richard Bennett , Logan (Buzzy) Nalley, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lisa Ashcraft, et al v. City of Vicksburg, et al
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 13-60563
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LISA ASHCRAFT and RANDY DANIEL ISAIAH ASHCRAFT
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF VICKSBURG, PAUL WINFIELD, individually and in his official capacity as Mayor of the City of Vicksburg, VICTOR GRAY-LEWIS, individually and in his official capacity as Director of Building & Planning for the City of Vicksburg and others
Ashcraft et al v. City of Vicksburg et al
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 5:2011cv00176
Plaintiff:
Lisa Ashcraft and Randy Daniel Isaiah Ashcraft
Defendant:
City of Vicksburg , Paul Winfield , Victor Gray-Lewis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.