Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv03407
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act (ADA)
Carter v. Rhoden et al
as 3:2022cv00499
Defendant:
Sheriff Scotty Rhoden, Baker County Sheriff's Office, RANDY DAVIS and others
Claimant:
ASHLEY JADE CARTER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clervrain et al v. Johnson et al
as 3:2022cv00244
Plaintiff:
Manetirony Clervrain, Alex Felix, Jhims Francois and others
Defendant:
Tae D. Johnson, Patrick J. Lechleitner, Ava Cates and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv02029
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2611
Brown et al v. Tazewell County, Illinois et al
as 1:2019cv01075
Defendant:
Police Officer William Dorn, Tazewell County, Illinois, Deputy Randy Davis and others
Plaintiff:
Deceased Matthew Brown and Susan Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. Streamline Production Systems, Inc.
as 9:2014cv00179
Plaintiff:
Randie Davis
Defendant:
Streamline Production Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Davis v. Streamline Production Systems, Inc.
as 9:2014cv00178
Plaintiff:
Randie Davis
Defendant:
Streamline Production Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Jocelyn Chatham v. Randy Davis, et al
as 14-3318
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOCELYN CHATHAM, Administrator of the Estate of MARVIN T. MCDONALD
Defendant - Appellee:
RANDY DAVIS, Warden, Pickneyville Correctional Center Wareden, PHILLIP PARKHILL, Officer, BRIAN FAGERLAND, Officer and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv05617
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv00149
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
