Cases 1 - 10 of 49
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00718
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
RICHARDSON v. FREEMAN et al
as 4:2023cv00188
Plaintiff:
ISRAEL DODD RICHARDSON
Defendant:
KENNY FREEMAN, CODY LOW and KYLE LEE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Silich v. Obermiller et al
as 2:2023cv00029
Plaintiff:
THOMAS DAVID SILICH
Defendant:
BRANDON OBERMILLER, JAMES WESLEY, III RICHARDSON, JOSEPH D CLEMMONS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
WARNER v. ANDERSON HOUSING AUTHORITY et al
as 1:2023cv00096
Plaintiff:
BRADLEY D. WARNER
Defendant:
ANDERSON HOUSING AUTHORITY, KIM TOWNSEND, LORRAINE RICHARDSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 dp Civil Rights - Denial of Due Process
Woods et al v. Richardson et al
as 2:2022cv00265
Plaintiff:
Myshira Woods and Demetri Woods
Defendant:
Latasha Richardson, Kathryn Malon, B. Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
RICHARDSON v. WORRALL et al
as 3:2022cv00136
Plaintiff:
LARRY RICHARDSON
Defendant:
MICHAEL WORRALL and MATTHEW BROOKMAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
YOUNG v. COUCH et al
as 1:2022cv01211
Plaintiff:
DAVID YOUNG
Defendant:
CHRIS COUCH, TOM FOUST, JOSH SCHERSCHEL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
SAPP v. EVANSVILLE POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 3:2021cv00108
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY S. SAPP
Defendant:
EVANSVILLE POLICE DEPARTMENT, D. RICHARDSON, SIDES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SAPP v. EVANSVILLE POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 3:2021cv00106
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY S. SAPP
Defendant:
EVANSVILLE POLICE DEPARTMENT, D. RICHARDSON, SIDES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00879
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
