Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Buenrostro v. City of Wilder, et al.
as 1:2021cv00304
Plaintiff:
Ruben Buenrostro
Defendant:
City of Wilder, Wilder Housing Authority and Mayor Robert Rhodes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Taylor v. The City of Chicago et al
as 1:2020cv00181
Defendant:
The City of Chicago, N. Mukite (#15038), Robert Rhodes (#12625) and others
Plaintiff:
Deandre Taylor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown v. Chicago et al
as 1:2019cv05296
Defendant:
City of Chicago, Joseph Lisciandrello, Unknown Police Officers and others
Plaintiff:
Latricia Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Rhodes et al v. West Virginia Division of Protective Services et al
as 2:2018cv01179
Defendant:
West Virginia Division of Protective Services, Gregory Scott Fernatt, Travas Bennett and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Rhodes and Robert Rhodes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2016cv09045
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Roe v. Chappaqua Central School District et al
as 7:2016cv07099
Plaintiff:
John Roe
Defendant:
Chappaqua Central School District , Board of Education of the Chappaqua Central School District , John Chambers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rhodes v. Tevin
as 12-1335
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Robert Rhodes
Defendant - Appellee:
Robert Tevins, Steven MacMartin and Donald Mania
Rhodes v. United States of America
as 12-1307
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Robert Rhodes
Defendant - Appellee:
United States of America
Rhodes v. United States of America
as 1:2007cv00470
Plaintiff:
Robert Rhodes
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rhodes v. Tevins et al
as 1:2007cv00471
Plaintiff:
Robert Rhodes
Defendant:
Robert Tevins, Steven MacMartin and Donald Mania
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
