Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Becker v. Wallerich et al
as 8:2023cv00468
Plaintiff:
Susanne Becker
Defendant:
Randy Wallerich, Melissa, Ken Schneider and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2020cv00414
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2019cv03088
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2019cv03090
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
McCoy v. Nebraska Dept. of Health and Human Services Licensing Unit et al
as 8:2018cv00570
Plaintiff:
Leila McCoy
Defendant:
J. Hagan, Every Member of The Executive Committee and Board of Directors of The Connection Homeless Shelter Inc., Unidentified Officer 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rossmann v. Dimon et al
as 8:2018cv00005
Defendant:
Warren Buffett, Jamie Dimon, John Doe-1 and others
Plaintiff:
Brud "Anti Anti Christ" 1 Rossmann
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2017cv00324
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Koch v. Kozeal et al
as 8:2016cv00079
Defendant:
City of Sargent, Nebraska, Mike Criss, Gwenda Horky and others
308) 728-7814 (fax:
Mark Allen Koch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2015cv03155
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2007cv00334
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
