Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Axelson v. United States of America
as 0:2023cv03913
Plaintiff:
Rian A Axelson and Rian Alan Axelson
Defendant:
State of MN and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mosby et al v. State of MN
as 0:2023cv03604
Plaintiff:
Alexisus Jarmon Mosby and D. Elise Bergeron
Defendant:
State of MN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Holmes v. Minnesota DOC et al
as 0:2023cv02969
Plaintiff:
Stephan Nicholas Holmes
Defendant:
Minnesota DOC, State of MN, Joan Wolfe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Grande v. U.S. Dept. of Human Services et al
as 0:2021cv01492
Defendant:
State of MN, MN DHS, U.S. Dept. of Human Services and others
Plaintiff:
Patrick Ryan Grande
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Occhino v. Geo, Sherman and Assoc. et al
as 0:2019cv02546
Plaintiff:
Richard Leo Occhino
Defendant:
MN State Judge John B. Schultee, Brent Malvick, State of MN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Jackson v. State of MN et al
as 0:2019cv00741
Defendant:
President Donald Trump, Federal And State Agencies and State of MN
Plaintiff:
Howard G. Jackson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2019cv00135
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Calhoun v. State of MN DHS Child Support Enforcement et al
as 0:2018cv01881
Defendant:
State of WA DHS Child Support Division, State of MN DHS Child Support Enforcement, Ashley Parker and others
Plaintiff:
Rhome J Calhoun
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Martin v. Mpls School Dist #1
as 0:2014cv04462
Plaintiff:
Schaaron Martin
Defendant:
Mpls School Dist #1, State of MN, City of Mpls and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hammond v. State of MN et al
as 0:2012cv01660
Plaintiff:
Forrest Hammond
Defendant:
State of MN, County of Anoka, Bruce Anderson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
