Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Higgins v. Blinken
as 23-34
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Mark Rock Higgins, DBA Higgins Family Trust, Irish beneficiary a emperor, a noble, a merchant,admiral, piloter, Seaman, Mariner, Shereef in Propria Persona sui Juris, Majoris aetatis suae
Defendant / Appellee:
Antony Blinken, Department of State, Jeri L. Williams, Stephen Richer and others
Higgins v. Blinken et al
as 1:2022cv10801
Plaintiff:
Mark Rock Higgins and Sean Rick Higgins
Defendant:
Antony Blinken, Jeri L. Williams, Stephen Richer and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Ellis v. State of Arizona et al
as 2:2022cv01480
Plaintiff:
Michael G Ellis
Defendant:
State of Arizona, JP Morgan Chase, Thomas Kelly and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Manning v. Pueblo Regional Center et al
as 1:2020cv03518
Defendant:
Nursing, Lori Spangler, Pueblo Regional Center and others
Plaintiff:
Sheila Renee Manning
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Horne et al v. Polk
as 3:2018cv08010
Plaintiff:
Thomas Horne and Kathleen M Winn
Defendant:
Sheila Sullivan Polk
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wright v. Yavapai, County of et al
as 3:2015cv08173
Plaintiff:
Dennis Matthew Wright
Defendant:
Yavapai, County of , Yavapai County Attorney's Office , Sheila Sullivan Polk and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Crater et al v. Arizona, State of et al
as 3:2012cv08190
Plaintiff:
Matthew John Crater and Brenda Lynn Crater
Defendant:
Arizona Attorney General's Office, Kent Cattini, Arthur Markham and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Howell, et al v. Polk, et al
as 06-16418
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT ALLEN HOWELL, husband and PATTI HOWELL, wife
Defendant - Appellee:
SHEILA SULLIVAN POLK, Yavapai County Attorney, ROBERT REED, City of Prescott Police Chief, DAVID BENNER, City of Prescott Assistant Police Chief and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
