Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Brown et al v. Ukeiley et al
as 2:2022cv07214
Plaintiff:
Adrienne Brown and Transitional Housing & Resources
Defendant:
Judge Stephen L. Vkeiley, Wells Fargo Bank N.A., Sheriff of Suffolk County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Monaco v. Stone
as 16-3537
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Gregory R. Monaco, on behalf of himself and other similarly situated individuals
Defendant - Appellee:
James L. Stone, in his official capacity of Commissoner of the New York State Office of Mental Health, Catherine A. Cahill, Patric A. Mahoney, in his official capacity of himself and all other sheriffs and other individuals who transport incompetent defendats from jails to psychiatric hospitals in New York State and others
Defendant:
Alan Aviles, in his official capacity as the Director of the New York City Health and Hospitals Corporation, Dominick Stanzione, in his official capacity as Acting Director of the Psychiatric Unit of Long island College Hospital, M.D. S. Tuzel and others
Bergeron, et al v. Cabral
as 10-1012
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TIMOTHY TURLEY, DAVID BERGERON, JOHN BARNES and others
Defendant - Appellee:
ANDREA CABRAL, individually and as Sheriff of Suffolk County
Nwachuku, et al v. Walsh, et al
as 09-1982
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ALEXANDER C. NWACHUKU and JOEATTA K. SMITH-NWACHUKU
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHAEL WALSH, JOHN KELLY, SEAN JOYCE and others
Defendant:
PLYMOUTH COUNTY, EDDY CHRISPIN, JOHN M. BUCKLEY and others
Bergeron, et al v. Cabral
as 08-1683
Plaintiff - Appellee:
DAVID BERGERON, JOHN GRENNON, LORNE F. LYNCH and others
Defendant - Appellant:
ANDREA CABRAL, individually and as Sheriff of Suffolk County
Scheurer v. Sheriff of Suffolk County et al
as 1:2007cv11986
Plaintiff:
Paul G. Scheurer
Defendant:
Sheriff of Suffolk County, Richard J. Turner and County of Suffolk
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
