Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Clervrain et al v. United States of America, National Labor Relations Board et al
as 5:2022cv00053
Plaintiff:
Manetirony Clervrain and Nathalie Jean Baptiste Clervrain
Defendant:
United States of America, National Labor Relations Board, Commonwealth of Kentucky Labor Cabinet, State of Alaska Department of Labor and Workforce Development and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Eunice v. Ellzey et al
as 2:2021cv02010
Plaintiff:
Angela Eunice
Defendant:
Dan Ellzey, South Carolina Department of Employment and Workforce, The and State of South Carolina
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jordan v. South Carolina Department of Employment and Workforce
as 3:2020cv03207
Plaintiff:
Timothy Jordan
Defendant:
South Carolina Department of Employment and Workforce
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv00791
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 16-1710
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 15-2103
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2015cv02556
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 791
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2014cv00647
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 13-2266
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Buel Inc v. South Carolina Department of Employment and Workforce
as 7:2013cv00463
Plaintiff:
Buel Inc
Defendant:
South Carolina Department of Employment and Workforce
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
