Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Adams, Jr. v. Lewis et al
as 1:2023cv00045
Plaintiff:
Thomas Adams, Jr.
Defendant:
Chad Lewis and County of Stanislaus
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Adams, Jr. v. Lewis et al
as 2:2023at00015
Plaintiff:
Thomas Adams, Jr.
Defendant:
Chad Lewis and County of Stanislaus
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Adams v. County Of Rockland et al
as 7:2021cv11062
Plaintiff:
Thomas Adams
Defendant:
County Of Rockland, The Rockland County District Attorney's Office, Town of Clarkstown Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
KEYES v. ADAMS et al
as 2:2018cv04699
Defendant:
ATTORNEY JEFFREY GRODER, THOMAS ADAMS, JUDGE HARRIS and others
Plaintiff:
KEYSEAN L. KEYES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Keyes v. Adams et al
as 3:2017cv01769
Plaintiff:
Keysean L. Keyes
Defendant:
Thomas Adams, Christopher Quinn, Madeline Singas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Keyes v. Clarke et al
as 2:2017cv06128
Defendant:
Judge Thomas Adam, Attorney James P Clarke, County Court Attorney Legal Aid and others
Plaintiff:
Keysean L Keyes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Keyes v. Singas et al
as 2:2017cv06132
Defendant:
Judge Thomas Adam, Judge Meryl Berkowitz, Judge Prager and others
Plaintiff:
Keysean L Keyes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Adams v. Village of Kirtland Hills et al
as 1:2017cv00055
Plaintiff:
Thomas Adams
Defendant:
Clyde Null, Jr. , Barry Hendricks , Village of Kirtland Hills Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv03868
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Young v. City of New York et al
as 1:2016cv01695
Plaintiff:
Tiesheia Young
Defendant:
City of New York , Police Officer Thomas Adams (Shield#001438) and New York Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
