Cases 1 - 10 of 85
Shaw v. Dart et al
as 2:2024cv00026
Plaintiff:
Corey Joseph A. Shaw
Defendant:
Tom Dart, Erin Stokes, Jacob Otto and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Williams v. Heflin et al
as 3:2023cv00952
Plaintiff:
Eric A Williams
Defendant:
Tom Heflin, Scott Turney, Shane Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Betts v. Marion City of et al
as 1:2023cv00408
Plaintiff:
Mylin S Betts, Mylon S Betts and Mylon Betts
Defendant:
Marion City of, Captain Jeff Wells, Officer Melton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00292
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
YOUNG v. COUCH et al
as 1:2022cv02199
Plaintiff:
DAVID YOUNG
Defendant:
CHRIS COUCH, TOM FOUST and JOSHUA SCHERSCHEL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
YOUNG v. COUCH et al
as 1:2022cv01211
Plaintiff:
DAVID YOUNG
Defendant:
CHRIS COUCH, TOM FOUST, JOSH SCHERSCHEL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Allen v. Thomas Kia of Highland et al
as 2:2022cv00077
Defendant:
Keith O. Allen, Thomas Kia of Highland, Tom Seeley and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
INDIANA MHC, LP v. HARRISON COUNTY REGIONAL SEWER DISTRICT et al
as 4:2022cv00041
Plaintiff:
Indiana MHC, LP
Defendant:
Harrison County Regional Sewer District, Darin Duncan, Tom Tucker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Slater v. Blinken et al
as 1:2022cv00070
Plaintiff:
Cortrez D Slater
Defendant:
Antony Blinken, Loretta H Rush, Tom Parker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Clervrain et al v. Hupfer et al
as 1:2021cv00471
Plaintiff:
Manetiony Clervrain, Francis Cobbina Osei-Fosu and Brandako Inc
Defendant:
Kyle Hupfer, Chuck Williams, Mary Martin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
