Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv07080
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e-2e Job Discrimination (Unlawful Employment Practices)
Cecil Elmore v. Ruben Islas, Jr. et al
as 2:2024cv01719
Defendant:
Doe 16, Ruben Islas, Jr., Ruben Islas and others
Plaintiff:
Cecil Elmore
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gurkirn Hundal v. Ruben Islas Jr. et al
as 2:2024cv01721
Plaintiff:
Gurkirn Hundal
Defendant:
Ruben Islas, Jr., Ruben Islas, Martha Islas Enriquez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01545
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01545
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Gurkirn Hundal v. Ruben Islas et al
as 2:2023cv10201
Plaintiff:
Gurkirn Hundal
Defendant:
Ruben Islas, Marth Enriquez, Joel Jimenez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Vasquez v. Concourse Village, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv02817
Defendant:
Madison Security Group, Prestige Management, Inc., Concourse Village, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Katherine Vasquez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 3601 Fair Housing Act
ARMAS v. SOUTH FLORIDA SECURITY GROUP, INC.
as 1:2020cv20999
Defendant:
SOUTH FLORIDA SECURITY GROUP, INC.
Plaintiff:
FRANK ARMAS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv01517
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Intervenor Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12112
Parks v. Prestige Management Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv02072
Plaintiff:
Joyce Parks
Defendant:
Prestige Management Inc. and Madison Security Group Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
