Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Clervrain et al v. Walker et al
as 2:2022cv00511
Plaintiff:
Manetirony Clervrain, Fabrice Thomas, Emmanuel Benjoassint and others
Defendant:
Mark Walker, Sandra Watson, Ken Burns and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Atkins v. Stivers et al
as 3:2021cv00470
Plaintiff:
Rebekah A. Atkins
Defendant:
Chief District Judge Greg N. Stivers, District Judge David J. Hale, District Judge Claria H. Boom and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Anderson v. Dickson et al
as 3:2019cv00068
Defendant:
Charles Clouse, Kathy Manegot, Karan Caldwell and others
Plaintiff:
Artis Anderson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lawrence v. United States District Court et al
as 3:2016cv00131
Plaintiff:
Marcus J. Lawrence, SR
Defendant:
United States District Court, Greg N. Stivers, Thomas B. Russell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hopson v. Shakes et al
as 3:2012cv00722
Plaintiff:
Deandre Hopson
Defendant:
James Shakes, Interchange Law Offices, Frank Mascagni and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Edward Flint v. Thomas Russell
as 11-5726
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EDWARD H. FLINT
Defendant - Appellee:
THOMAS B. RUSSELL
Flint v. Russell
as 3:2011cv00291
Plaintiff:
Edward H. Flint
Defendant:
Thomas B. Russell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Connie Marshall v. Charles Simpson, III, et al
as 10-5640
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CONNIE MARSHALL
Defendant - Appellee:
CHARLES R. SIMPSON, III, Judge, JOHN G. HEYBURN, II, Judge, JENNIFER B. COFFMAN, Judge and others
Connie Marshall v. Charles Simpson, III, et al
as 10-5459
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CONNIE MARSHALL
Defendant - Appellee:
CHARLES R. SIMPSON, III, Judge, JOHN G. HEYBURN, II, Judge, JENNIFER B. COFFMAN, Judge and others
Skudnov v. Russell
as 1:2008cv00112
Plaintiff:
Boris Nickolaevich Skudnov
Defendant:
Thomas B. Russell
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
