Cases 1 - 10 of 25
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00347
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv02349
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Mall v. Binkley et al
as 2:2023cv02240
Plaintiff:
Mark Anthony Mall
Defendant:
Rob Binkley doing business as EZ Homes Incorporated, Scott E Williams doing business as Zona Law Group, Tiffany & Bosco PA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00318
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Smith v. McDonalds Corporation et al
as 2:2023cv00735
Plaintiff:
Tiffany Smith and Tiffany R Smith
Defendant:
McDonalds Corporation and McDonalds Restaurants of Arizona Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv01586
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Stanberry-Sproles v. Arizona Department of Child Safety et al
as 2:2022cv00364
Plaintiff:
Aneta Stanberry-Sproles
Defendant:
Arizona Department of Child Safety, Tina Canale, Adina Wade and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Hatley et al v. Hughes et al
as 2:2021cv01098
Plaintiff:
Imelda Hatley and Andrea J Garcia
Defendant:
Jennifer Garland and Tiffany Hughes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv00888
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv01129
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
