Cases 1 - 10 of 32
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00047
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00741
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Etienne v. Sanders et al
as 5:2023cv00214
Respondent:
KAREN REA PERKINS, MACHELLE SANDERS, TAMMIE ELAINE HALL and others
Petitioner:
DINEEN CHERYLANN ETIENNE
Defendant:
Reserve at Carrington Place
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Blackwell v. McFadden et al
as 3:2022cv00167
Plaintiff:
Adrianna Esther Blackwell
Defendant:
Garry L. McFadden, Dwight D. Weller, Tiffany Parker Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00049
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Intervenor Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2022cv00026
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Williams v. City of Charlotte et al
as 3:2021cv00649
Plaintiff:
Patrice Williams
Defendant:
City of Charlotte, Brandon Ottelin and Tiffany Anderson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 cv
Cloud v. Stevens et al
as 5:2021cv00470
Plaintiff:
James Cloud and James R. Cloud
Defendant:
Mark Stevens and Tiffany A. Lesnik
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Gates v. Galuski et al
as 3:2021cv00582
Plaintiff:
Tiffany Gates
Defendant:
Thomas Galuski and Town of Pineville
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2021cv00391
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
