Civil Rights Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 22
Fuentes et al v. PA State Police et al
as 3:2014cv01078
Plaintiff: Michael Andrew Peter Fuentes, Michael Andrew Fuentes, Jr., Mary Linda Margretta Fuentes and others
Defendant: PA State Police, PA Interrogators, Dept of Motor Vehicles and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331
Rahinah Ibrahim v. USDHS, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 14-16161
Plaintiff - Appellant: RAHINAH IBRAHIM, an individual
Defendant - Appellee: U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, MICHAEL CHERTOFF, in his official capacity as the former Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security, TOM RIDGE, in his official capacity as the former Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security and others
Rahinah Ibrahim v. USDHS, et al
as 14-16160
Plaintiff - Appellant: RAHINAH IBRAHIM, an individual
Defendant - Appellee: U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, MICHAEL CHERTOFF, in his official capacity as the former Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security, TOM RIDGE, in his official capacity as the former Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security and others
Rahinah Ibrahim v. Department of Homeland Securit, et al Featured Case We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 10-15873
Plaintiff - Appellant: RAHINAH IBRAHIM, an individual
Defendant - Appellee: DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, MICHAEL CHERTOFF, in his official capacity as the former Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security, TOM RIDGE, in his official capacity as the former Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security and others
Rahinah Ibrahim v. Department of Homeland Securit, et al
as 10-15352
Plaintiff - Appellant: RAHINAH IBRAHIM, an individual
Defendant - Appellee: DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, MICHAEL CHERTOFF, in his official capacity as the former Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security, TOM RIDGE, in his official capacity as the former Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security and others
Defendant: JOHN BONDANELLA, an individual, US INVESTIGATIONS SERVICES, INC., a Virginia corporation, CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO and others
Rahinah Ibrahim v. Department of Homeland Securit, et al
as 10-15342
Plaintiff - Appellee: RAHINAH IBRAHIM, an individual
Defendant - Appellant: DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, MICHAEL CHERTOFF, in his official capacity as the former Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security, TOM RIDGE, in his official capacity as the former Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security and others
Defendant - Appellee: JOHN BONDANELLA, an individual, US INVESTIGATIONS SERVICES, INC., a Virginia corporation, CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO and others
Rahinah Ibrahim v. Department of Homeland Securit, et al
as 09-17160
Plaintiff - Appellant: RAHINAH IBRAHIM, am individual
Defendant - Appellee: DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, MICHAEL CHERTOFF, in his official capacity as the former Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security, TOM RIDGE, in his official capacity as the former Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security and others
Alice McCabe, et al v. Michelle Mais We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 09-1847
Plaintiff - Appellant: Alice McCabe and Christine Nelson
Defendant: Michael Parker, Iowa State Patrol, W. Ralph Basham and others
Defendant - Appellee: Michelle Mais, Deputy Sheriff
Alice McCabe, et al v. Michael Parker, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 09-1185
Plaintiff - Appellant: Alice McCabe and Christine Nelson
Defendant - Appellee: Michael Parker, W. Ralph Basham, Tom Ridge and others
Defendant: Iowa State Patrol
Krua v. United States Department of Homeland Security et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2009cv10081
Plaintiff: Torli H. Krua
Defendant: United States Department of Homeland Security, George W. Bush, Michael Chertoff and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?