Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Isaiah Dashawn Richard v. Los Angeles Police Department et al
as 2:2023cv09360
Plaintiff:
Isaiah Dashawn Richard
Defendant:
Los Angeles Police Department, CVS Health Elaine Selan, Scientology and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
SHERVEN v. U.S. OFFICE OF SPECIAL COUNSEL
as 1:2023cv00754
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW J. SHERVEN
Defendant:
U.S. OFFICE OF SPECIAL COUNSEL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Christopher Newcomb v. U.S. Office of Special Counsel, et al
as 12-55461
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER NEWCOMB
Defendant - Appellee:
U.S. OFFICE OF SPECIAL COUNSEL and CAROLYN LERNER, United States Special Counsel, in her official capacity
PERALES et al v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2012cv00704
Plaintiff:
AZAEL DYTHIAN PERALES, BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA and DANIEL KEN "DAN&q INOUYE
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, U.S. PENTAGON, U.S. SECRET SERVICE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Newcomb v. U.S. Office of Special Counsel et al
as 3:2011cv02431
Plaintiff:
Christopher Newcomb
Defendant:
U.S. Office of Special Counsel and Carolyn Lerner
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2010cv04380
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Newcomb v. U.S. Office of Special Counsel et al
as 3:2010cv01923
Plaintiff:
Christopher Newcomb
Defendant:
U.S. Office of Special Counsel and William E. Reukauf
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 09-5040
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
James Neuman v. United States Government
as 08-5535
Plaintiff - Appellant:
James Neuman
Defendant - Appellee:
United States Government, United States Department of Justice, Department of Coordination and Review for the Department of Justice and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
