Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Quizel Welsh v. United States, et al
as 24-1003
Plaintiff:
Quizel Welsh, "I Am That I Am"
Defendant:
United States of America, Ghan & Cooper Commercial Properties, Kathleen Caldarrera, Partner and others
Welsh v. USA et al
as 4:2023cv00712
Defendant:
Meta, USA, Ghan & Cooper Commercial Properties and others
Plaintiff:
Quizel Welsh
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Arthur Carson v. UAMS Medical Center, et al
as 23-2215
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Arthur Carson
Defendant / Appellee:
UAMS Medical Center, Hospital and Daniel Holleyman, Emergency Room Physician
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00332
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Carson v. UAMS Medical Center et al
as 4:2023cv00328
Plaintiff:
Arthur Carson
Defendant:
UAMS Medical Center and Daniel Holleyman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
Sinclair v. University of Tennessee et al
as 4:2020cv01413
Defendant:
UAMS, St Bernard's Healthcare, Bryant White and others
Plaintiff:
Dominique Sinclair
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sinclair v. Tennessee University Medical Science et al
as 4:2020cv01375
Defendant:
Tennessee University Medical Science, UAMS, St Bernards Medical Science and others
Plaintiff:
Dominique Sinclair
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sinclair v. UAMS et al
as 4:2020cv00189
Defendant:
Kristi Kerr, Karen Reynolds, UAMS and others
Plaintiff:
Dominique Sinclair
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Griffin v. USA et al
as 4:2019cv00664
Plaintiff:
Tamara Griffin
Defendant:
FedEx, USA, Nike and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McNeil v. University of Arkansas Foundation Inc et al
as 4:2019cv00104
Defendant:
University of Arkansas Foundation Inc, Mary Prince, Sherri L Robinson and others
Plaintiff:
Minor McNeil
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
