Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Ronald Emrit v. Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA)
as 22-1269
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RONALD SATISH EMRIT
Defendant / Appellee:
BOARD OF IMMIGRATION APPEALS, UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES, UNITED STATES CUSTOMS AND BORDER PROTECTION AGENCY and others
Leon Haughton v. US
as 22-1056
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LEON HAUGHTON
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, UNITED STATES CUSTOMS AND BORDER PROTECTION AGENCY and others
Ronald Emrit v. Board of Immigration Appeal
as 15-1944
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RONALD SATISH EMRIT and NICOLE ROCIO LEAL-MENDEZ
Defendant - Appellee:
U.S. BOARD OF IMMIGRATION APPEALS, (BIA), UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES, (CIS), IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT, (ICE) and others
Ronald Emrit v. Board of Immigration Appeals
as 15-1944
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RONALD SATISH EMRIT and NICOLE ROCIO LEAL-MENDEZ
Defendant / Appellee:
U.S. BOARD OF IMMIGRATION APPEALS, (BIA), UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES, (CIS), IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT, (ICE) and others
Angelex LTD. v. US
as 13-1610
Petitioner - Appellee:
ANGELEX LTD., as owner of the M/V Antonis G. Pappadakis, and the M/V Antonis G. Pappadakis in rem
Respondent - Appellant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, UNITED STATES COAST GUARD and UNITED STATES CUSTOMS AND BORDER PROTECTION AGENCY
Angelex LTD. v. United States Of America et al
as 2:2013cv00237
Petitioner:
Angelex LTD.
Respondent:
United States Of America , United States Coast Guard and United States Customs and Border Protection Agency
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Admiralty
Ross Robin v. Princess Cruise Lines et al
as 2:2008cv04442
Plaintiff:
Ross Robin and Ross Robin
Defendant:
Princess Cruise Lines, The United States of America, The Department of Homeland Security and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
