Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2022cv04706
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12117 Americans with Disabilities Act
Kathaleen Smalls v. Barack Obama
as 16-1927
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KATHALEEN B. SMALLS
Defendant - Appellee:
PRESIDENT BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA, ASHTON B. CARTER, Secretary, Department of Defense, LORETTA E. LYNCH, Attorney General, Department of Justice and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv02441
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Smalls v. Obama et al
as 7:2016cv01788
Plaintiff:
Kathaleen B Smalls
Defendant:
Barack Obama, Ashton Carter, Loretta Lynch and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bryson v. United States Department of Justice et al
as 1:2015cv00329
Plaintiff:
William Mack Bryson, Jr.
Defendant:
United States Department of Justice and United States Attorney for the District of South Carolina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Brunson v. United States et al
as 3:2014cv02540
Plaintiff:
Ronald Brunson
Defendant:
United States, Federal Bureau of Investigation, Attorney General of the United States and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bookert v. Federal Bureau of Investigation et al
as 3:2009cv01309
Plaintiff:
Isaaci Bookert
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Investigation, Attorney General of the United States Department of Justice and United States Attorney for the District of South Carolina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Bookert v. United States Department of Justice et al
as 3:2009cv01182
Plaintiff:
Isaaci Bookert
Defendant:
United States Department of Justice, Attorney General of the United States Department of Justice and United States Attorney for the District of South Carolina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
