Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Pinero-Gago v. Torres-Rios et al
as 3:2023cv01577
Plaintiff:
Mr. Eulando Pinero-Gago
Defendant:
Mr. Alexis Torres-Rios, Mr Rafael Riviere-Vazquez, Mr. Marcos Concepcion-Tirado and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv01177
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv00182
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Mercado-Vazquez v. Olivera-Olivera et al
as 3:2021cv01620
Plaintiff:
Javier Mercado-Vazquez
Defendant:
Virgilio Olivera-Olivera, Victor Gonzalez-Morales and Municipality of San German
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gonzalez-Lopez v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania et al
as 1:2018cv01955
Petitioner:
Victor Gonzalez-Lopez
Respondent:
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania and Dauphin County, 6754-CR-2017
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv00252
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Evangelina Gonzalez et al v. County of Los Angeles et al
as 2:2016cv07018
Defendant:
County of Los Angeles, Does, Deputy Adrian Dominguez and others
Plaintiff:
Evangelina Gonzalez and Victor Gonzalez
Gonzalez v. City Of New York, et al
as 1:2015cv07703
Plaintiff:
Victor Gonzalez
Defendant:
City of New York, Julien, Swindell-King and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rosario-Vega v. Gonzalez-Bothwell et al
as 3:2015cv01906
Plaintiff:
Fernando Rosario-Vega
Defendant:
Victor Gonzalez-Bothwell, Thomas Trebilecock and Federal Public Defender
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Castro v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2014cv05171
Plaintiff:
Brian Castro
Defendant:
The City of New York , Victor Gonzalez and John Robinson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
