Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Watty v. Cuomo et al
as 1:2016cv04520
Defendant:
Steven Banks, Ash Carter, Beth F. Cobert and others
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel Keith Watty
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv04351
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Lynn Gavin v. Bartholomew Murphy, et al
as 13-15622
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LYNN GAVIN
Defendant - Appellee:
BARTHOLOMEW MURPHY, MICHAEL J. ANTONINI, RICH HILLIS and others
Gavin v. Murphy et al
as 4:2012cv05864
Plaintiff:
Lynn Gavin
Defendant:
Bartholomew Murphy, Michael J. Antonini, Rich Hillis and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Watty v. Cuomo et al
as 2:2012cv02660
Defendant:
Elizabeth R. Berline, Michael Bloomberg, Kevin Boyle and others
Motion Clerk:
Ira Sternberg
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel Keith Watty
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Watty v. Georgia Department of Human Services et al
as 3:2011cv00192
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel Keith Watty
Defendant:
Georgia Department of Human Services, Clyde L. Reese, III, Sharon King and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
David Wattie-Bey, et al v. Atty Gen PA Ofc, et al
as 10-4680
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID WATTIE-BEY and ALICIA WATTIE
Defendant - Appellee:
ATTY GEN PA OFC and DIV CHILDREN AND YOUTH SER
Wattie-Bey et al v. Attorney General's Office et al
as 1:2010cv02224
Plaintiff:
David Wattie-Bey and Alicia Wattie
Defendant:
Attorney General's Office and Division for Children, Youth Services
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Treymel Coleman et al v. City of Pasadena et al
as 2:2010cv07645
Plaintiff:
Mary Callum, Treymel Coleman, K. E. and others
Defendant:
City of Pasadena, Does, Officer J. Gurrola and others
Larry Thomas v. City of Pasadena et al
as 2:2010cv07166
Defendant:
City of Pasadena, Does, Officer J. Gurrola and others
Plaintiff:
Larry Thomas
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
