Cases 1 - 9 of 9
SHINE v. COUNTY OF MONTGOMERY et al
as 2:2023cv01952
Plaintiff:
BRYAN J. SHINE
Defendant:
COUNTY OF MONTGOMERY, COUNTY OF CHESTER, COUNTY OF DAUPHIN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv00633
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
YODER v. OFFICE OF THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY, MONTGOMERY CTY et al
as 2:2019cv01274
Defendant:
MS. TERRY, CHESTER COUNTY PROBATION, PAROLE & PRETRIAL SERVICES, MR. MICHAEL FALIN and others
Plaintiff:
CYNTHIA M. YODER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Mann v. Joseph et al
as 1:2018cv05905
Plaintiff:
William Mann
Defendant:
Henry Adrian Joseph, Clayton County, Michael Watts and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv02559
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Robert Mann, Sr., et al v. City of Sacramento, et al
as 17-17048
Plaintiff - Appellee:
ROBERT MANN, Sr., VERN MURPHY-MANN, DEBORAH MANN and others
Defendant:
CITY OF SACRAMENTO, SACRAMENTO POLICE DEPARTMENT and SAMUEL D. SOMERS, Jr.
Defendant - Appellant:
JOHN C. TENNIS and RANDY R. LOZOYA
Mann et al v. City of Sacramento et al
as 2:2017cv01201
Plaintiff:
Robert Mann, Sr. , Vern Murphy-Mann , Deborah Mann and others
Defendant:
City of Sacramento , Sacramento Police Department , Samuel D. Somers, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mann, Sr. et al v. City of Sacramento
as 2:2016cv01847
Plaintiff:
William Mann, Sr. , Robert Mann , Deborah Mann and others
Defendant:
City of Sacramento, John Tennis and Randy Lozoya
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Mann, Sr. et al v. City of Sacramento et al
as 2:2016at00968
Plaintiff:
William Mann, Sr. , Robert Mann , Deborah Mann and others
Defendant:
City of Sacramento and DOES 1-50 inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
