Cases 91 - 100 of 632
DIAZ v. OBERLANDER et al
as 1:2021cv00044
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDANT MICHAEL OVERMYER, PA. DOC. DEREK F. OBERLANDER, UNIT SGT. MAHONEY and others
Plaintiff:
ULYSSES S. DIAZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
KAETZ v. UNKNOWN U.S. MARSHALS et al
as 2:2021cv00062
Defendant:
UNKNOWN U.S. MARSHALS, MATTHEW A. HOHMAN, CLAIR CECCHI and others
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM F. KAETZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
SVENTEK v. OBERLANDER et al
as 1:2021cv00006
Respondent:
D. F. OBERLANDER, PENNSYLVANIA ATTORNEY GENERAL OFFICE, DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF FOREST COUNTY and others
Petitioner:
ANDREW M. SVENTEK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Vasquez v. Haste et al
as 1:2021cv00019
Defendant:
Brian S. Clark, Lt. Tim Manwiller, Mike Pries and others
Plaintiff:
Brian Vasquez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Timmons v. Walters et al
as 1:2020cv02393
Defendant:
Fifth Defendant, Seventh Defendant, Sixth Defendant and others
Plaintiff:
Brandon Timmons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ELLIOTT v. GEHRET et al
as 2:2020cv06331
Defendant:
(?)(PHILADELPHIA PUBLIC DEFENDER'S OFFICE), ERIC ZUCKERMAN, DAVID C. SHUTER and others
Plaintiff:
NATHANIEL LEROY ELLIOTT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MITCHELL v. OBERLANDER et al
as 2:2020cv06097
Petitioner:
RICHARD MITCHELL and RICHARD LEE MITCHELL
Respondent:
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and DEREK F. OBERLANDER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
LOPEZ v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2020cv01781
Defendant:
MARTIN F. HORN, JEFFREY A. BEARD and JOHN WETZEL
Plaintiff:
GEORGE I. LOPEZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Graves v. Wetzel et al
as 1:2020cv01965
Defendant:
Michael Zaken, Rebecca Cristini and John Wetzel
Plaintiff:
Daquan F. Graves
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
HAMM v. ZAGORSKIE et al
as 2:2020cv04659
Defendant:
TOM HOGAN, RONALD C. NAGLE, CHARLES (LAST NAME UNKNOWN) and others
Plaintiff:
ANCELL EUGENE HAMM
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
