Cases 91 - 100 of 171
Kidd v. Holladay
as 4:2016cv00855
Plaintiff:
Corey Kidd, Sr
Defendant:
Doc Holladay
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Derrick Allen v. Doc Holladay, et al
as 16-3962
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Derrick L. Allen
Defendant - Appellee:
Doc Holladay, Sheriff, Randolph, Deputy, Pulaski County Regional Detention Facility, Darryl Musaddiq, Sergeant, Pulaski County Regional Detention Facility (originally named as Musaddiq) and others
Engstrom v. Holladay et al
as 4:2016cv00588
Plaintiff:
David William Engstrom
Defendant:
Doc Holladay, Randy Morgan, Carl Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robinson v. Atking et al
as 4:2016cv00538
Plaintiff:
Christopher Blair Deshaun Robinson
Defendant:
A Atking, Scott Thomisee, Lockhart and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bryant Billings v. Carl Johnson, et al
as 16-2532
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Bryant Anthony Billings
Defendant - Appellee:
Carl Lynn Johnson, Doctor, Pulaski County Jail (originally named as Johnson), Doc Holladay, Pulaski County Sheriff (originally named as Doc Holiday), Dale Reed, Warden, Malvern Unit ADC and others
Wofford v. Holladay et al
as 4:2016cv00143
Plaintiff:
Ricky Wofford, Jr
Defendant:
Doc Holladay, Pulaski County Regional Detention Facility, Bennett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Range v. Holladay et al
as 4:2016cv00126
Plaintiff:
Tai Range
Defendant:
Doc Holladay, Thomisee and T Turner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McClendon v. Holladay et al
as 4:2015cv00343
Plaintiff:
Eddie Lee McClendon
Defendant:
Doc Holladay, Randy Morgan, Sarah Speers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Engstrom v. Holladay et al
as 4:2015cv00297
Plaintiff:
David William Engstrom
Defendant:
Doc Holladay, Randy Morgan and Townsend
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Engstrom v. Holladay
as 4:2015cv00236
Plaintiff:
David William Engstrom
Defendant:
Doc Holladay
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
