Cases 91 - 99 of 99
STYLES v. PALAKOVICH et al
as 2:2009cv02412
Petitioner:
MAURICE A. STYLES
Respondent:
JOHN PALAKOVICH, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Buchanan v. Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2009cv02079
Plaintiff:
Dwayne Buchanan
Defendant:
Department of Corrections, George Okada, Donovan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Taylor v. Pierce et al
as 1:2009cv00052
Plaintiff:
Christopher Taylor
Defendant:
Jack Pierce, Mark Herman, Capt Gilbert and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Taylor v. Williams et al
as 1:2008cv00557
Plaintiff:
Christopher Taylor
Defendant:
Jerry Williams, Jack Pierce, Van Whitmire and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Timothy Nash v. CMHA, et al
as 08-3476
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TIMOTHY M. NASH
Defendant - Appellee:
CUYAHOGA METROPOLITAN HOUSING AUTHORITY, DETECTIVE STYLES, Metropolitan Housing Authority Police #656, DETECTIVE NEAL, Metropolitan Housing Authority Police #35 and others
Anthony Robinson v. Gray Davis, et al
as 08-15632
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANTHONY L. ROBINSON
Defendant - Appellee:
GRAY DAVIS, Govenor, EDWARD S. ALAMEIDA, Jr., STATE OF CALIFORNIA and others
Hicks v. Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2007cv01829
Plaintiff:
Ronnie L Hicks
Defendant:
Department of Corrections, Ken Quinn, Chris Glenn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
STYLES v. KELCHER et al
as 2:2007cv04175
Petitioner:
MAURICE A. STYLES
Respondent:
DONALD KELCHER and PA ATTORNEY GENERAL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Styles v. Kelcher
as 1:2007cv01774
Petitioner:
Maurice A. Styles
Respondent:
Donald Kelcher and PA Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
