Cases 91 - 100 of 300
Woody v. Kelley et al
as 1:2020cv01252
Defendant:
Ben Burnett, Jimmy Gray, Union City Police Department, Union City, TN and others
Plaintiff:
Cornilios Woody
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bruce, Jr. v. TN Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2020cv01247
Plaintiff:
Bobby D. Bruce, Jr.
Defendant:
Madison County, TN and TN Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jennette v. Stallings et al
as 1:2020cv00068
Defendant:
Kendra Burton, Christopher Stallings, Sherrell Summers and others
Plaintiff:
Dominique Jennette
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lee v. State of TN Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2020cv01217
Defendant:
TDOC employees of Security & I.A., C/O, CPL'S, Sgt's, Lt's & CPts as well as I.A., State of TN Department of Corrections and others
Plaintiff:
Jason Edward Lee, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davidson v. SCDC Penal Farm Memphis, TN 38134
as 2:2020cv02723
Plaintiff:
Thomas Dale Davidson
Defendant:
SCDC Penal Farm Memphis, TN 38134
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lowe v. Anderson Cnty, TN et al
as 3:2020cv00416
Defendant:
Anderson Cnty, TN, Ridgeview Mental Health, F Fenton and others
Plaintiff:
Benny Chris Lowe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cage v. TN Dept of Correction
as 3:2020cv00792
Plaintiff:
Quinton Cage
Defendant:
TN Dept of Correction and Deberry Special Needs Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bunch v. Anderson County, TN et al
as 3:2020mc00055
Defendant:
Anderson County, TN and Southern Health Partners
Plaintiff:
Ronald N Bunch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jett v. Anderson County, TN et al
as 3:2020cv00365
Defendant:
Anderson County, TN, Ridgeview Mental Health Services and James Landry
Plaintiff:
Christopher Logan Jett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Radley v. Metro Police Department Nashville, TN et al
as 3:2020cv00677
Defendant:
Eric Thomas and Metro Police Department Nashville, TN
Plaintiff:
Demonse Radley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
