Cases 91 - 100 of 215
Moshir v. United States Postal Service et al
as 1:2017cv00412
Plaintiff:
Ali Moshir
Defendant:
United States Postal Service, Government, NEOCC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. United States Postal Service et al
as 5:2017cv00196
Plaintiff:
Lonnie B. Davis
Defendant:
United States Postal Service, FNU Childs, FNU Collins and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Felton Matthews, Jr. v. USA, et al
as 17-15712
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FELTON L. MATTHEWS, Jr.
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, STATE OF NEVADA and others
Prasad v. USDA/FDA et al
as 3:2017cv00141
Plaintiff:
Sundari K. Prasad
Defendant:
USDA/FDA, United States Postal Service, New Jersey State and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 17-1244
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
R. Johnson v. DVA, et al
as 17-1181
Plaintiff - Appellant:
R. WAYNE JOHNSON
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS and UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2016cv03797
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Durr v. United States Postal Service, ex rel et al
as 1:2016cv11028
Plaintiff:
Stephen Durr
Defendant:
United States Postal Service, Ex rel , Chicago Bulk Mail Center, Great Lakes Region and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Gowadia v. Fed. Bureau of Prisons et al
as 1:2016cv02626
Plaintiff:
Noshir Gowadia
Defendant:
Fed. Bureau of Prisons, Fed. Bureau of Investigations, United States Postal Service and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Mitchell et al
as 5:2016cv01137
Plaintiff:
R Wayne Johnson
Defendant:
Suzanne Mitchell, Shon Erwin, United States Postal Service and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
