Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 91 - 100 of 1,186,082
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv03020
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bonilla v. Freeman et al
as 4:2024cv03010
Plaintiff: Steven Wayne Bonilla
Defendant: Judge Beth Labson Freeman and Judge Howard R. Lloyd
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Porter v. Rivera et al
as 1:2024cv00599
Plaintiff: Sumpter Porter
Defendant: Laquin Rivera, Gomez, Hilderbrand and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00899
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Piper v. Ceresini et al
as 1:2024cv00601
Petitioner: Robert James Piper
Respondent: Warden Scott Ceresini, The State of Delaware and The Attorney General of the State of Delaware
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
WARD v. SULSBERRY
as 4:2024cv00217
Petitioner: BRANDY LEE WARD
Respondent: SULSBERRY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
ROSARIO v. MOODY et al
as 4:2024cv00215
Plaintiff: JEFREY ROSARIO
Defendant: ASHLEY MOODY and RICKY D DIXON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MCMILLIAN v. JONES et al
as 4:2024cv00216
Plaintiff: XAVIER T MCMILLIAN
Defendant: DELDRON JONES, BRANDON GRANGER and ISAAC REDDING
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MCKENZIE v. CREWS
as 5:2024cv00098
Plaintiff: TABITHA MCKENZIE
Defendant: KEVIN CREWS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kenley, Michael v. Florida Department of Corrections
as 9:2024cv80645
Plaintiff: Michael S. Kenley
Defendant: Florida Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?