Cases 101 - 110 of 1,718
DAKER v. WARD et al
as 5:2022cv00340
Plaintiff:
WASEEM DAKER
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER TIMOTHY WARD, FACILITIES DIRECTOR JACK KOON, JOHNNY SIKES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DAKER v. WARD et al
as 5:2022cv00342
Plaintiff:
WASEEM DAKER
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER TIMOTHY WARD, BRIAN OWENS, HOMER BRYSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-13116
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Alexander-Campos v. Reinke et al
as 4:2022cv05253
Plaintiff:
Robert J. Alexander-Campos, lll and Robert E. Samuel
Defendant:
Benjermin Reinke, Thomas Walsh, Joseph Eichhorn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Therian Wimbush v. Therese Barnes, et al
as 22-13074
Plaintiff / Appellant:
THERIAN WIMBUSH
Defendant / Appellee:
THERESE S. BARNES, Clerk Supreme Court of GA, TIA C. MILTON, Chief Deputy Clerk Supreme Court of GA, STEPHEN E. CASTLEN, Clerk Court of Appeals of GA and others
Walker v. Morris et al
as 2:2022cv00083
Plaintiff:
Kennedy Terrell Walker
Defendant:
FNU Morris, FNU Griffin, J. Millier and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McFarland v. Cobb County Government et al
as 1:2022cv03494
Plaintiff:
Chance McFarland and Catherine
Defendant:
Cobb County Government, State of Georgia Government, Cobb County Jail and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Broome v. Temple Texas Police Department et al
as 6:2022cv00892
Plaintiff:
Richard Broome
Defendant:
Temple Texas Police Department, Temple Texas Code Enforcment Employees, Sgt M. Trunecker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Milton v. Trate et al
as 1:2022cv01002
Plaintiff:
Kyle David Milton
Defendant:
B. M. Trate, R. Paltenghi and Dr. Grassely
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
