Cases 101 - 110 of 5,667
Saracina et al v. Haendiges et al
as 6:2024cv06005
Plaintiff:
Scott A. Saracina, Perez Authtry, Jason Mitchell and others
Defendant:
Deborah A. Haendiges, Shelia O'Sullivan Thie and John J. Flynn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Eason v. Raoul et al
as 3:2023cv50462
Defendant:
AFSCME, Kwame Raoul, J. B. Pritzker and others
Plaintiff:
Hannibal Eason
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(HC) Perez-Robles v. Pratt
as 2:2023cv03044
Petitioner:
Fermin Perez-Robles
Respondent:
Glen Pratt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Daontae Scott v. E. Perez Lugo, et al
as 23-14177
Plaintiff:
DAONTAE T. SCOTT
Defendant:
E. PEREZ LUGO, AUBREY PADGETT, CHRISTINA CREWS and others
Jefferson (ID 44578) v. Moore et al
as 5:2023cv03263
Plaintiff:
Anthony Jefferson
Defendant:
Leonard Moore, Austin Merz, Bryan Buchman and others
Interested Party:
Kansas Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
J.B. v. Gray et al
as 3:2023cv01962
Plaintiff:
J.B.
Defendant:
Levi Gray, Jayson Leak, Paul Kizer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Perez-Quevedo v. United States of America
as 8:2023cv02994
Plaintiff:
Luis Ernesto Perez-Quevedo
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Houston (PS) v. Starr et al
as 1:2023cv03423
Plaintiff:
Eric Houston
Defendant:
M. Starr, Vido, A. Armijo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Perez v. Jacquez
as 3:2023cv01926
Petitioner:
Hector Diaz Perez
Respondent:
Israel Jacquez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Rios v. Meyer et al
as 5:2023cv00302
Plaintiff:
John Gabriel Rios
Defendant:
Brent Meyer, Wanda Mason, Derek Hester and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
