Cases 101 - 110 of 1,747
Gorbey v. State of Georgia et al
as 1:2023cv02535
Plaintiff:
Michael S. Gorbe and Michael S. Gorbey
Defendant:
State of Georgia, Attorney General State of Georgia, Governor State of Georgia and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jordan v. State of North Carolina
as 5:2023hc02123
Petitioner:
Jovon Lamar Jordan
Respondent:
State of North Carolina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
MOSLEY v. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
as 1:2023cv00443
Petitioner:
FRANKLIN JAMES MOSLEY
Respondent:
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Thomas Kurek v. State of North Carolina
as 23-6504
Petitioner / Appellant:
THOMAS EDWARD KUREK
Respondent / Appellee:
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
Hartley v. State of North Carolina
as 5:2023hc02113
Petitioner:
Drew C. Hartley
Respondent:
State of North Carolina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Lester v. State of North Carolina
as 5:2023hc02110
Petitioner:
Andre Eugene Lester
Respondent:
State of North Carolina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Wolfe v. State of North Carolina
as 5:2023hc02107
Petitioner:
Marilyn M. Wolfe
Respondent:
State of North Carolina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Allen v. State of North Carolina
as 1:2023cv00128
Petitioner:
Christopher I. Allen
Respondent:
State of North Carolina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Davis v. State of North Carolina et al
as 5:2023ct03151
Plaintiff:
Ty Davis and Ty Rayshun Davis
Defendant:
State of North Carolina and Edgecombe County Courthouse
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Quintin Wright v. State of North Carolina
as 23-6475
Petitioner / Appellant:
QUINTIN SINCLAIR WRIGHT
Respondent / Appellee:
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
