Cases 101 - 110 of 115
Debose v. Valenza et al (INMATE 2)
as 1:2019cv00326
Defendant:
Lt. King, Sgt. Peterson, Assistant Commander Moore and others
Plaintiff:
Phillip Debose
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cook v. Valenza et al (INMATE 1)
as 1:2019cv00314
Defendant:
Assistant Commander Moore, Sgt. Peterson, James Brazier and others
Plaintiff:
Quinton Cook
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Balcom v. Valenza et al (INMATE 2)
as 1:2019cv00305
Defendant:
Houston County Board of Health, Alabama Department of Corrections, Assistant Commander Moore and others
Plaintiff:
Ronald Devone Balcom
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Balcom v. Culver et al (INMATE 2)
as 1:2019cv00141
Defendant:
Sgt. Peterson, Lt. Moore, Sgt. McCallister and others
Plaintiff:
Ronald Devone Balcom
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Balcom v. Valenza et al (INMATE 2)
as 1:2019cv00132
Defendant:
Lt. Jones, Jason Smoak, Sgt. Peterson and others
Plaintiff:
Ronald Devone Balcom
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Balcom v. Valenza et al (INMATE 1)
as 1:2019cv00116
Defendant:
Lt. Jones, Jason Smoak, Sgt. Watson and others
Plaintiff:
Ronald Devone Balcom
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Holmes v. Houston County Jail (INMATE 2)
as 1:2019cv00017
Defendant:
Houston County Jail, Dewayne Downs, Lt. Jones and others
Plaintiff:
Arthur Wade Holmes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Anderson v. Dart et al
as 1:2018cv00490
Plaintiff:
Dontrail Anderson
Defendant:
Tom Dart, SGT. Peterson, Nurse Humphrey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Vanpietersom v. Peterson et al
as 2:2018cv00060
Plaintiff:
Matthew T Vanpietersom
Defendant:
Sgt Peterson and HSU Provider
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McDougald v. Grissom et al (INMATE 1)
as 1:2017cv00771
Plaintiff:
Rufus Terry McDougald, Jr.
Defendant:
CO Grissom, Officer Watson, Officer Landreau and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
