Cases 111 - 120 of 302
RAY v. ROGERS et al
as 2:2012cv00985
Plaintiff:
FREDERICK T. RAY
Defendant:
JEFF ROGERS, DAVID MITCHELL, COI HARKLEROAD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TRAVAGLIA v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2012cv00901
Petitioner:
MICHAEL J. TRAVAGLIA
Respondent:
JOHN E. WETZEL , LOUIS FOLINO and MARIROSA LAMAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Vernon Williams v. Louis Folino, et al
as 12-2468
Plaintiff - Appellant:
VERNON WILLIAMS
Defendant - Appellee:
LOUIS FOLINO and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
TORRES v. FOLINO et al
as 5:2012cv02545
Petitioner:
CARLOS TORRES
Respondent:
LOUIS FOLINO, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY JAMES B. MARTIN and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF LINDA KELLY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
WILLIAMS v. FOLINO et al
as 2:2012cv00507
Plaintiff:
RODGER E. WILLIAMS
Defendant:
LOUIS FOLINO, MARK CAPOZZA, FERRIER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
James Beasom v. Attorney General Pennsylvania, et al
as 12-2043
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES EDWARD BEASOM
Defendant - Appellee:
ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA, DISTRICT ATTORNEY BLAIR COUNTY and LOUIS FOLINO, Superintendent
Clay Caldwell v. Louis Folino, et al
as 12-1971
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CLAY CALDWELL
Defendant - Appellee:
LOUIS FOLINO, Superintendent, M. A. PRICE, Lieutenant, GAGNON, Sgt. and others
HOUSER v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2012cv01792
Petitioner:
DARIEN HOUSER
Respondent:
JOHN E. WETZEL, LOUIS FOLINO and MARIROSA LAMAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 dp Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (DEATH PENALTY)
MORGAN-COX v. FOLINO et al
as 2:2012cv01780
Petitioner:
ARMOUR MORGAN-COX
Respondent:
LOUIS FOLINO, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PENNSYLVANIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Reginald Byrd v. Louis Folino
as 12-1931
Plaintiff - Appellant:
REGINALD BYRD
Defendant - Appellee:
LOUIS FOLINO, ET AL
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
