Cases 121 - 130 of 195
McIntosh v. Manitowoc County et al
as 1:2013cv00749
Plaintiff:
Charles T McIntosh
Defendant:
Manitowoc County, Unknown, Mayor City of Manitowoc and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wayne Hart, Jr. v. Michael Thurmer, et al
as 13-1107
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WAYNE J. HART, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHAEL THURMER, SUSAN KIMBALL, PAUL SUMNICHT and others
Zaragoza v. WalMart Corporation et al
as 3:2013cv00054
Plaintiff:
Luis Raymond Zaragoza
Defendant:
WalMart Corporation, Zachary Straus, Andres Naughten and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Manuel Pardo, Jr. v. John Palmer, et al
as 12-16280
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MANUEL PARDO, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN PALMER, KENNETH S. TUCKER and DOES 1-50
Wayne Hart, Jr. v. Michael Thurmer, et al
as 12-3755
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WAYNE J. HART, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHAEL THURMER, SUSAN KIMBALL, PAUL SUMNICHT and others
Pardo, Jr. v. Palmer et al
as 3:2012cv01328
Plaintiff:
Manuel Pardo, Jr.
Defendant:
John Palmer , Kenneth S. Tucker and Does 1-50
Intervenor_plaintiff:
Eugene Wayman McWatters
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ferguson v. Palmer et al
as 3:2012cv01036
Plaintiff:
John Ferguson
Defendant:
John Palmer , Kenneth S. Tucker and Does 1-50
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Banks v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 1:2012cv01440
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, Timothy C. Outlaw, Warden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
In re Michael Williams
as 3:2012cv01449
Plaintiff:
Michael Williams
Defendant:
A. Sangha, John Doe 1, John Doe 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Frederick Banks v. Bureau of Indian Affairs, et al
as 12-1858
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Frederick Banks
Defendant - Appellee:
Bureau of Indian Affairs, Commissioner and Director, Department of Interior, Secretary, Eric Holder, Department of Justice and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
